• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Last week, Utah Attorney General Sean D. Reyes joined 23 other states in a letter to Pornhub’s mother or father company with concerns over content material that includes underaged youngsters. As just lately reported, an worker for the corporate was captured on video by an undercover journalist discussing Pornhub’s moderation practices, where he admitted a "loophole." When uploading content material to the site, customers are required to submit a photograph ID but are usually not required to point out their face in the uploaded material. The employee admitted there isn't a strategy to confirm the individual importing the photo ID is identical individual within the content material. He replied, "Of course," when requested if rapists and human traffickers use this loophole to add content material of their victims to make money. As you're conscious, various Federal and state legal guidelines forbid the creation and distribution of CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material.) We're involved that Aylo and its subsidiary Pornhub, and possibly different subsidiaries, may be proliferating the manufacturing and dissemination of CSAM through the ‘loophole’ identified by your employee. Please present us with an explanation of this ‘loophole;’ whether Aylo and its subsidiaries do, in truth, permit content creators and performers to obscure their faces in uploaded content; and, if so, whether or not Aylo is taking measures to alter this coverage to ensure that no kids or different victims are being abused for profit on any of its platforms.

Inventions that have been ahead of their time can help us to know whether or not we're truly ready to live in the world we are making. Speculative fiction fans know that you can create a whole world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to describe a whole galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and tablet can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for an entire alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their every element - but hinting at them by highlighting mere sides that signify a coherent actuality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its tales are endearing to the heart. Creating objects in the true world is nearly exactly the same; that’s why invention is a threat. Once we create one thing new - actually, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the balance of help it could have on this planet during which it emerges and the power it should remake that world.

When a product fails because it was "ahead of its time," that usually means that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It could possibly be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet pc, though his Newton MessagePad failed soon after it launch in 1993 and is now principally forgotten. In hindsight, it’s easy to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological improvement offered higher hardware, screens, batteries, software program, and connectivity. And although anyone thinking about a pill had probably been ready for one since even earlier than the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being full of PADDs, the one thing that really ready the world for the tablet pc was the cell phone. In 1993, hardly anyone had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion individuals used them. A world in which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to cellular computing is one ready for a bridge system between a small cell screen and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, after all, isn’t alone. So many merchandise and applied sciences which might be commonplace immediately made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t really succeed. Not because they weren’t good ideas, but because the world wasn’t fairly prepared and they weren’t highly effective sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls almost 15 years earlier than Minority Report advised us all to anticipate them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 player, of course; that distinction goes to the completely unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the primary actually good or actually successful one; the iPod actually ought to get the credit for that. But, it did risk its id on a monthly subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was bought to simply weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was launched in 2013 and died a humiliating however quick dying after a widely known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a reality a lot creepier than any of us want.

But nearly a decade later, each major tech firm is both making a face pc or xhamster is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and then over and over again. There are, after all, many older examples. Much older ones, in actual fact, just like the precise first vehicle - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century earlier than the first fuel powered vehicle vehicle launched by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the time period "battery" in 1749, however it wasn’t till half a century later that Alessandro Volta constructed one. And, it turns out that the basics of batteries have been understood and in use over 2,000 years ago! But my favorite one is the PicturePhone. The fundamental idea of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates again to the 1870s (long before any of us had been warned by The Jetsons that video telephones would pressure us into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many many years). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not but President) made the primary public video call from Washington, D.C.