• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Pornhub has started accepting cryptocurrency as a payment choice, the company announced at the moment. The location now accepts Verge cryptocurrency (no relation to The Verge), a rebranded version of Dogecoindark, which cut up off from the unique meme coin, Dogecoin, in 2014. Now, customers can pay for any Pornhub options, including a Premium subscription, using Verge cryptocurrency. Pornhub’s grownup sister websites, Brazzers and Nutaku, also settle for Verge cryptocurrency now. Verge cryptocurrency is anonymity-focused, which is why Pornhub executives say they selected it over different potential companions. It needs to be noted that anyone can view Verge cryptocurrency transactions by means of its public ledger, however it uses the anonymity device Tor and an nameless network layer I2P to hide specific transactions’ IP addresses and places. Since public ledgers often have their downfalls in protecting anonymity, xhamster users additionally choose to hide on Verge cryptocurrency’s private ledger. Corey Price, VP at Pornhub, tells The Verge that cryptocurrency presents "convenience and safety." It’s a dubious statement, considering most digital coins have excessive transaction charges and risky costs that can be a hassle for users. Companies like Valve and Stripe have ended their cryptocurrency help for these very reasons. Stripe has even gone so far as adding cryptocurrency to its prohibited businesses listing. Verge cryptocurrency has been pretty volatile, like other fashionable digital coins. 0.22 per coin however has since dropped back down. On the heels of this announcement right now, it rose to about 10 cents per coin, which remains to be low in comparison with extra widespread digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. "We’ve been looking at crypto for quite a while," says Price, including that Pornhub’s accomplice sites did settle for limited cryptocurrencies back when Bitcoin had newly emerged as a digital forex. Still, Pornhub wasn’t one of the websites to incorporate cryptocurrency as a fee methodology again then, possible because Bitcoin’s prices were still low.

Inventions that have been forward of their time will help us to understand whether or not we're actually ready to live on this planet we are making. Speculative fiction fans know that you would be able to create a complete world out of only a handful of objects. A lightsaber can start to explain a complete galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and tablet can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a complete alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for his or her every detail - but hinting at them by highlighting mere aspects that signify a coherent actuality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the heart. Creating objects in the real world is nearly exactly the same; that’s why invention is a threat. After we create something new - actually, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the balance of support it will have on the planet in which it emerges and the facility it will have to remake that world.

When a product fails because it was "ahead of its time," that normally implies that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It could be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the pill laptop, despite the fact that his Newton MessagePad failed soon after it launch in 1993 and is now largely forgotten. In hindsight, it’s easy to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological improvement provided better hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And though anybody all in favour of a pill had most likely been prepared for one since even earlier than the MessagePad thanks to the Star Trek universe being full of PADDs, the one factor that actually prepared the world for the tablet computer was the cell phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion people used them. A world by which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to cellular computing is one ready for a bridge gadget between a small cell screen and a big stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, of course, isn’t alone. So many merchandise and applied sciences that are commonplace at present made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t actually succeed. Not because they weren’t good concepts, however as a result of the world wasn’t quite ready they usually weren’t powerful enough to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls virtually 15 years earlier than Minority Report instructed us all to count on them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 player, in fact; that distinction goes to the completely unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It also wasn’t the first actually good or actually profitable one; the iPod actually should get the credit score for that. But, it did danger its id on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was sold to simply weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating however fast loss of life after a widely known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a reality a lot creepier than any of us want.