• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Hell back in '09 Pornhub was operating smooth on a similar stack with very few servers (when you think about the visitors).For those who ask me most of what was "invented" after 2004 is stuff invented by Google/Facebook who are realistically the one ones needing it, but they noticed a possibility to scoop up market share in dev so that they marketed their stack as "bleeding edge". The only thing bleeding is my eyes when i see something that could possibly be wiped up in a normal PHP/Python/Ruby stack however as a substitute is made with so many dependencies and third social gathering library that you wonder if the dude who wrote it really is aware of programming or if he just glued cool techs collectively as a result of Techcrunch and HackerNews say they're cool.But sure, the smaller gamers are usually using outdated stuff, then once more 99% of the web is. Hence why Wordpress is still a thing.And as a former Lead Dev of Pornhub, I can guarantee you that tech peeps positively are aware of the bleeding edge of tech, simply that almost all tend to not buy the hype.

Inventions that were ahead of their time can help us to grasp whether or not we are truly able to dwell on the earth we're making. Speculative fiction fans know that you could create a whole world out of only a handful of objects. A lightsaber can start to explain a complete galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for an entire alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for his or her every element - however hinting at them by highlighting mere sides that symbolize a coherent reality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the center. Creating objects in the real world is almost exactly the identical; that’s why invention is a risk. When we create one thing new - truly, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the balance of assist it can have on the earth during which it emerges and the ability it must remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that often implies that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It might be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet computer, though his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now principally forgotten. In hindsight, it’s straightforward to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological improvement provided better hardware, screens, batteries, software program, and connectivity. And although anyone inquisitive about a pill had most likely been ready for one since even before the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being stuffed with PADDs, the one thing that basically prepared the world for the tablet laptop was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anyone had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion individuals used them. A world wherein over 70% of its population is already accustomed to cellular computing is one ready for a bridge system between a small mobile display and a big stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, after all, isn’t alone. So many products and technologies which can be commonplace at the moment made their debuts in products that didn’t really succeed. Not because they weren’t good concepts, however because the world wasn’t quite prepared and they weren’t highly effective sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls almost 15 years earlier than Minority Report instructed us all to anticipate them… ’re still not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 participant, in fact; that distinction goes to the completely unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the primary really good or actually successful one; the iPod really should get the credit for that. But, it did danger its id on a monthly subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was bought to simply weren’t ready for. Google Glass was launched in 2013 and died a humiliating but quick demise after a widely known tech bro wore it within the shower, xnxx reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a actuality much creepier than any of us want.

But nearly a decade later, each main tech company is either making a face computer or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, after which over and over again. There are, of course, many older examples. Much older ones, in actual fact, like the actual first vehicle - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century earlier than the primary gasoline powered vehicle car launched by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the term "battery" in 1749, however it wasn’t till half a century later that Alessandro Volta constructed one. And, it seems that the basics of batteries have been understood and in use over 2,000 years ago! But my favourite one is the PicturePhone. The fundamental idea of transmitting image and audio over wire dates again to the 1870s (lengthy before any of us were warned by The Jetsons that video telephones would force us right into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many decades). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the primary public video call from Washington, D.C.