• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Inventions that were forward of their time might help us to know whether or not we're actually able to dwell on the earth we are making. Speculative fiction fans know you could create a complete world out of only a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to explain a whole galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and tablet can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a complete alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their every detail - however hinting at them by highlighting mere aspects that characterize a coherent actuality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its tales are endearing to the guts. Creating objects in the true world is almost exactly the same; that’s why invention is a threat. When we create one thing new - really, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the steadiness of assist it can have on the planet through which it emerges and the ability it should remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that usually signifies that its makers succeeded at world-constructing, not invention. It might be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, pornhub invented the tablet laptop, regardless that his Newton MessagePad failed soon after it launch in 1993 and is now largely forgotten. In hindsight, it’s straightforward to see why Ive’s pad succeeded where Gassée’s did not: twenty years of technological development supplied higher hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And regardless that anyone enthusiastic about a pill had most likely been ready for one since even earlier than the MessagePad thanks to the Star Trek universe being crammed with PADDs, the one thing that basically prepared the world for the pill laptop was the cell phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion folks used them. A world through which over 70% of its inhabitants is already accustomed to cellular computing is one prepared for a bridge system between a small cell screen and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, after all, isn’t alone. So many products and technologies which might be commonplace in the present day made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t actually succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good ideas, however because the world wasn’t fairly prepared and so they weren’t powerful enough to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls nearly 15 years earlier than Minority Report advised us all to anticipate them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 participant, after all; that distinction goes to the utterly unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It also wasn’t the primary actually good or really successful one; the iPod really ought to get the credit score for that. But, it did risk its identity on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was offered to only weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating however quick demise after a well-known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a reality a lot creepier than any of us want.

But virtually a decade later, every major tech firm is either making a face laptop or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and then over and over. There are, after all, many older examples. Much older ones, actually, like the precise first automobile - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century before the primary gasoline powered car vehicle launched by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the time period "battery" in 1749, however it wasn’t until half a century later that Alessandro Volta constructed one. And, it seems that the basics of batteries were understood and in use over 2,000 years in the past! But my favorite one is the PicturePhone. The essential concept of transmitting image and audio over wire dates back to the 1870s (lengthy before any of us have been warned by The Jetsons that video phones would drive us into a falseness that anticipated our perfectly curated Zoom backgrounds by many many years). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not but President) made the primary public video name from Washington, D.C.

New York City. This early system used a closed circuit system, however inside a number of decades, Bell Labs managed to create gear that could make use of the country’s present phone lines. This is what Bell Telephone introduced to the world at the 1964 World’s Fair, the PicturePhone. By that time, it was prepared for hype, however not use. It took just a few more years of anticipation-constructing for Bell Telephone to get their product ready. But they didn’t hold back on their marketing. In one of the vital incredible examples of product placement in cinema of all time, Bell Telephone was prominently featured in a scene from Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A space Odyssey in 1969. That was Bell’s way of saying, give us thirty years or so - not only will you be PicturePhoning cross-country, you’ll be calling space, too! A 12 months later, the PicturePhone was demonstrated in public. The primary call utilizing the first consumer-ready PicturePhone was made by the Mayor of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania to the chairman of Alcoa, one of the city’s most essential manufacturers.