• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Hell again in '09 Pornhub was running smooth on an identical stack with only a few servers (when you think about the traffic).Should you ask me most of what was "invented" after 2004 is stuff invented by Google/Facebook who're realistically the only ones needing it, however they noticed a possibility to scoop up market share in dev so that they marketed their stack as "bleeding edge". The one thing bleeding is my eyes after i see one thing that could possibly be wiped up in a typical PHP/Python/Ruby stack however as a substitute is made with so many dependencies and third social gathering library that you wonder if the dude who wrote it actually is aware of programming or if he simply glued cool techs together because Techcrunch and HackerNews say they are cool.But yes, the smaller gamers are normally utilizing outdated stuff, then again 99% of the web is. Hence why Wordpress is still a factor.And as a former Lead Dev of Pornhub, I can assure you that tech peeps undoubtedly are aware of the bleeding edge of tech, simply that most have a tendency to not purchase the hype.

Inventions that were ahead of their time may also help us to grasp whether we're truly ready to dwell on the planet we are making. Speculative fiction followers know you can create an entire world out of only a handful of objects. A lightsaber can start to explain a complete galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand xnxx in for a complete alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their each detail - but hinting at them by highlighting mere facets that symbolize a coherent reality beneath them. If that reality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its tales are endearing to the heart. Creating objects in the actual world is almost precisely the same; that’s why invention is a threat. Once we create one thing new - truly, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the steadiness of assist it will have in the world during which it emerges and the power it should remake that world.

When a product fails because it was "ahead of its time," that usually means that its makers succeeded at world-constructing, not invention. It could possibly be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the pill laptop, even though his Newton MessagePad failed soon after it launch in 1993 and is now largely forgotten. In hindsight, it’s straightforward to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological development offered higher hardware, screens, batteries, software program, and connectivity. And although anybody inquisitive about a tablet had probably been ready for one since even earlier than the MessagePad thanks to the Star Trek universe being full of PADDs, the one thing that basically prepared the world for the tablet computer was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anyone had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion people used them. A world wherein over 70% of its inhabitants is already accustomed to cell computing is one ready for a bridge machine between a small cellular display and a big stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, after all, isn’t alone. So many products and technologies which can be commonplace as we speak made their debuts in products that didn’t truly succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good ideas, however because the world wasn’t fairly prepared they usually weren’t highly effective sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls almost 15 years before Minority Report informed us all to count on them… ’re still not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 participant, of course; that distinction goes to the completely unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the first actually good or actually profitable one; the iPod actually ought to get the credit score for that. But, it did danger its identification on a monthly subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was offered to just weren’t ready for. Google Glass was launched in 2013 and died a humiliating but quick dying after a well known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a reality a lot creepier than any of us want.

But virtually a decade later, each main tech firm is both making a face laptop or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, after which again and again. There are, in fact, many older examples. Much older ones, in truth, like the precise first vehicle - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century before the first gas powered vehicle car launched by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the term "battery" in 1749, however it wasn’t until half a century later that Alessandro Volta built one. And, it turns out that the fundamentals of batteries had been understood and in use over 2,000 years in the past! But my favourite one is the PicturePhone. The basic concept of transmitting image and audio over wire dates back to the 1870s (long earlier than any of us were warned by The Jetsons that video telephones would power us right into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many many years). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the first public video call from Washington, D.C.