• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Last week, Utah Attorney General Sean D. Reyes joined 23 other states in a letter to Pornhub’s father or mother firm with concerns over content material that includes underaged youngsters. As lately reported, an worker for the corporate was captured on video by an undercover journalist discussing Pornhub’s moderation practices, the place he admitted a "loophole." When uploading content material to the site, customers are required to submit a photo ID but are usually not required to point out their face in the uploaded material. The employee admitted there is no solution to affirm the individual uploading the photograph ID is identical individual in the content material. He replied, "Of course," when requested if rapists and human traffickers use this loophole to upload content of their victims to earn cash. As you're conscious, various Federal and state legal guidelines forbid the creation and distribution of CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material.) We're concerned that Aylo and its subsidiary Pornhub, and probably different subsidiaries, may be proliferating the manufacturing and dissemination of CSAM by the ‘loophole’ identified by your worker. Please present us with a proof of this ‘loophole;’ whether or not Aylo and its subsidiaries do, in truth, permit content material creators and performers to obscure their faces in uploaded content; and, if so, whether Aylo is taking measures to alter this policy to ensure that no youngsters or different victims are being abused for profit on any of its platforms.

Inventions that had been ahead of their time might help us to grasp whether we're really able to reside on this planet we're making. Speculative fiction followers know that you can create a complete world out of only a handful of objects. A lightsaber can start to explain an entire galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and porn pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a complete alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for his or her each element - but hinting at them by highlighting mere sides that characterize a coherent actuality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its tales are endearing to the guts. Creating objects in the true world is sort of exactly the same; that’s why invention is a danger. Once we create one thing new - actually, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the balance of help it will have on the earth wherein it emerges and the ability it will have to remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that usually means that its makers succeeded at world-constructing, not invention. It may very well be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the pill computer, despite the fact that his Newton MessagePad failed soon after it launch in 1993 and is now mostly forgotten. In hindsight, it’s easy to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological growth offered better hardware, screens, batteries, software program, and connectivity. And though anybody curious about a pill had probably been prepared for one since even before the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being filled with PADDs, the one thing that really ready the world for the tablet pc was the cell phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion folks used them. A world by which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to cell computing is one prepared for a bridge device between a small mobile screen and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, in fact, isn’t alone. So many merchandise and technologies which can be commonplace as we speak made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t truly succeed. Not because they weren’t good ideas, but as a result of the world wasn’t fairly ready and they weren’t highly effective enough to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls nearly 15 years before Minority Report instructed us all to count on them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 participant, after all; that distinction goes to the utterly unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It also wasn’t the primary really good or actually successful one; the iPod actually ought to get the credit for that. But, it did danger its id on a monthly subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was offered to just weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was launched in 2013 and died a humiliating but quick dying after a well-known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a actuality a lot creepier than any of us need.

But almost a decade later, each main tech firm is either making a face computer or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and then time and again. There are, after all, many older examples. Much older ones, in truth, like the actual first vehicle - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century before the first fuel powered automobile car introduced by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the term "battery" in 1749, but it surely wasn’t till half a century later that Alessandro Volta constructed one. And, it seems that the fundamentals of batteries had been understood and in use over 2,000 years ago! But my favorite one is the PicturePhone. The essential concept of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates back to the 1870s (lengthy earlier than any of us were warned by The Jetsons that video phones would force us right into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many many years). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the first public video call from Washington, D.C.