• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Hell again in '09 Pornhub was running easy on an analogous stack with only a few servers (when you consider the site visitors).If you happen to ask me most of what was "invented" after 2004 is stuff invented by Google/Facebook who're realistically the only ones needing it, but they saw a possibility to scoop up market share in dev so they marketed their stack as "bleeding edge". The one thing bleeding is my eyes when i see one thing that may very well be wiped up in a regular PHP/Python/Ruby stack however instead is made with so many dependencies and third get together library that you just wonder if the dude who wrote it actually is aware of programming or if he just glued cool techs together as a result of Techcrunch and HackerNews say they are cool.But sure, the smaller players are usually using outdated stuff, then again 99% of the net is. Hence why Wordpress remains to be a factor.And as a former Lead Dev of Pornhub, I can guarantee you that tech peeps positively are conscious of the bleeding edge of tech, simply that almost all tend to not purchase the hype.

Inventions that have been forward of their time may also help us to understand whether we are actually ready to dwell on this planet we are making. Speculative fiction fans know that you may create a complete world out of only a handful of objects. A lightsaber can start to explain a whole galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for an entire alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for his or her every detail - however hinting at them by highlighting mere facets that characterize a coherent actuality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its tales are endearing to the center. Creating objects in the real world is almost precisely the identical; that’s why invention is a danger. Once we create something new - actually, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the balance of assist it will have on the planet by which it emerges and the facility it will have to remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that usually implies that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It could possibly be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the pill pc, even though his Newton MessagePad failed soon after it launch in 1993 and is now mostly forgotten. In hindsight, it’s straightforward to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological improvement supplied higher hardware, screens, batteries, software program, and connectivity. And though anyone involved in a tablet had in all probability been ready for one since even before the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being full of PADDs, the one factor that really ready the world for the tablet pc was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion individuals used them. A world during which over 70% of its inhabitants is already accustomed to mobile computing is one ready for a bridge system between a small mobile display and a big stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, after all, isn’t alone. So many products and applied sciences which might be commonplace at present made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t really succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good concepts, but because the world wasn’t quite prepared they usually weren’t highly effective sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls nearly 15 years earlier than Minority Report advised us all to anticipate them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 player, in fact; that distinction goes to the utterly unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the first actually good or really successful one; the iPod actually should get the credit score for that. But, it did danger its identification on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was sold to only weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was launched in 2013 and died a humiliating but fast demise after a well-known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a reality a lot creepier than any of us want.

But virtually a decade later, each main tech company is both making a face laptop or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and then over and over again. There are, in fact, many older examples. Much older ones, the truth is, like the actual first automobile - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century earlier than the primary fuel powered car vehicle launched by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the time period "battery" in 1749, however it wasn’t till half a century later that Alessandro Volta constructed one. And, it turns out that the fundamentals of batteries have been understood and in use over 2,000 years in the past! But my favourite one is the PicturePhone. The basic idea of transmitting image and audio over wire dates back to the 1870s (lengthy before any of us have been warned by The Jetsons that video telephones would drive us into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many many years). In 1927, xhamster Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the primary public video name from Washington, D.C.