• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Last week, Utah Attorney General Sean D. Reyes joined 23 other states in a letter to Pornhub’s mother or father firm with considerations over content material that includes underaged kids. As lately reported, an employee for the company was captured on video by an undercover journalist discussing Pornhub’s moderation practices, where he admitted a "loophole." When importing content material to the location, customers are required to submit a photograph ID however are not required to show their face within the uploaded materials. The worker admitted there is no such thing as a option to confirm the person uploading the photo ID is similar person in the content material. He replied, "Of course," when asked if rapists and human traffickers use this loophole to add content material of their victims to become profitable. As you are conscious, various Federal and state laws forbid the creation and distribution of CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material.) We're concerned that Aylo and its subsidiary Pornhub, and presumably different subsidiaries, may be proliferating the production and dissemination of CSAM through the ‘loophole’ identified by your employee. Please present us with an evidence of this ‘loophole;’ whether or not Aylo and its subsidiaries do, in fact, permit content creators and performers to obscure their faces in uploaded content; and, if so, whether or not Aylo is taking measures to vary this policy to ensure that no children or other victims are being abused for profit on any of its platforms.

Inventions that were ahead of their time might help us to understand whether or not we are actually ready to reside on the planet we're making. Speculative fiction fans know you can create a whole world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can start to explain a whole galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a whole alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their each detail - however hinting at them by highlighting mere aspects that represent a coherent actuality beneath them. If that reality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its tales are endearing to the guts. Creating objects in the real world is sort of precisely the same; that’s why invention is a danger. When we create one thing new - actually, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the stability of assist it can have on this planet during which it emerges and the facility it will have to remake that world.

When a product fails because it was "ahead of its time," that often signifies that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It could possibly be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet laptop, though his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now largely forgotten. In hindsight, it’s easy to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological improvement supplied better hardware, screens, batteries, software program, and connectivity. And although anybody focused on a pill had in all probability been prepared for one since even before the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being filled with PADDs, the one factor that basically prepared the world for the pill computer was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion individuals used them. A world by which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to cellular computing is one ready for a bridge gadget between a small cellular display and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, of course, isn’t alone. So many products and applied sciences which can be commonplace at present made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t really succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good ideas, however as a result of the world wasn’t quite ready they usually weren’t powerful sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls virtually 15 years before Minority Report told us all to expect them… ’re still not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 participant, in fact; that distinction goes to the fully unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It also wasn’t the first really good or really profitable one; the iPod actually ought to get the credit for that. But, it did danger its identity on a monthly subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was sold to only weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was launched in 2013 and died a humiliating however fast death after a well known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a actuality a lot creepier than any of us want.

But virtually a decade later, each major tech firm is both making a face laptop or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, after which time and again. There are, after all, many older examples. Much older ones, in actual fact, like the precise first automobile - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century earlier than the first gas powered vehicle automobile launched by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the time period "battery" in 1749, but it wasn’t till half a century later that Alessandro Volta built one. And, it seems that the basics of batteries had been understood and in use over 2,000 years in the past! But my favourite one is the PicturePhone. The basic idea of transmitting image and audio over wire dates back to the 1870s (lengthy earlier than any of us have been warned by The Jetsons that video phones would power us right into a falseness that anticipated our perfectly curated Zoom backgrounds by many decades). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the primary public video call from Washington, D.C.