• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Hell back in '09 Pornhub was running clean on an identical stack with very few servers (when you consider the site visitors).Should you ask me most of what was "invented" after 2004 is stuff invented by Google/Facebook who are realistically the one ones needing it, however they saw a chance to scoop up market share in dev so that they marketed their stack as "bleeding edge". The only thing bleeding is my eyes once i see one thing that could possibly be wiped up in a typical PHP/Python/Ruby stack but instead is made with so many dependencies and 3rd social gathering library that you wonder if the dude who wrote it really knows programming or if he just glued cool techs together because Techcrunch and HackerNews say they are cool.But sure, the smaller players are normally using outdated stuff, then again 99% of the net is. Hence why Wordpress is still a factor.And as a former Lead Dev of Pornhub, I can assure you that tech peeps positively are aware of the bleeding edge of tech, simply that most have a tendency to not purchase the hype.

Inventions that had been forward of their time will help us to grasp whether we are actually able to dwell on this planet we're making. Speculative fiction fans know you could create an entire world out of only a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to describe a whole galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a complete alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for his or her every element - however hinting at them by highlighting mere aspects that signify a coherent reality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its tales are endearing to the guts. Creating objects in the true world is almost exactly the identical; that’s why invention is a risk. Once we create something new - truly, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the steadiness of support it may have in the world by which it emerges and the ability it should remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that usually means that its makers succeeded at world-constructing, not invention. It could be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, xnxx invented the pill pc, although his Newton MessagePad failed soon after it launch in 1993 and is now largely forgotten. In hindsight, it’s simple to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s did not: twenty years of technological growth offered better hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And though anybody fascinated about a pill had in all probability been prepared for one since even earlier than the MessagePad because of the Star Trek universe being full of PADDs, the one factor that actually prepared the world for the pill computer was the cell phone. In 1993, hardly anyone had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion folks used them. A world during which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to cell computing is one ready for a bridge system between a small cell display screen and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, after all, isn’t alone. So many products and applied sciences that are commonplace today made their debuts in products that didn’t really succeed. Not because they weren’t good ideas, but because the world wasn’t fairly prepared they usually weren’t highly effective enough to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls nearly 15 years before Minority Report instructed us all to count on them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 participant, after all; that distinction goes to the completely unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the primary actually good or really successful one; the iPod actually should get the credit for that. But, it did risk its id on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was offered to only weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was launched in 2013 and died a humiliating but fast demise after a well-known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a actuality a lot creepier than any of us want.

But almost a decade later, each main tech company is either making a face computer or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and then over and over. There are, after all, many older examples. Much older ones, actually, like the precise first vehicle - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century earlier than the first gas powered vehicle vehicle launched by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the term "battery" in 1749, but it surely wasn’t till half a century later that Alessandro Volta built one. And, it seems that the basics of batteries were understood and in use over 2,000 years ago! But my favourite one is the PicturePhone. The essential idea of transmitting image and audio over wire dates again to the 1870s (lengthy earlier than any of us had been warned by The Jetsons that video telephones would force us into a falseness that anticipated our perfectly curated Zoom backgrounds by many decades). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not but President) made the primary public video name from Washington, D.C.