• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Hell back in '09 Pornhub was working clean on an identical stack with very few servers (when you think about the traffic).In the event you ask me most of what was "invented" after 2004 is stuff invented by Google/Facebook who are realistically the one ones needing it, but they saw a chance to scoop up market share in dev so they marketed their stack as "bleeding edge". The one thing bleeding is my eyes when i see one thing that could possibly be wiped up in a normal PHP/Python/Ruby stack however as a substitute is made with so many dependencies and third get together library that you just marvel if the dude who wrote it really is aware of programming or if he just glued cool techs collectively as a result of Techcrunch and HackerNews say they're cool.But sure, the smaller gamers are usually utilizing outdated stuff, then again 99% of the net is. Hence why Wordpress continues to be a factor.And as a former Lead Dev of Pornhub, I can guarantee you that tech peeps definitely are conscious of the bleeding edge of tech, just that the majority generally tend to not buy the hype.

Inventions that have been forward of their time may help us to grasp whether or not we're actually able to reside on the planet we are making. Speculative fiction fans know that you can create an entire world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can start to explain an entire galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a whole alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their every detail - but hinting at them by highlighting mere facets that represent a coherent reality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the guts. Creating objects in the true world is nearly exactly the identical; that’s why invention is a threat. Once we create one thing new - really, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the steadiness of support it will have on this planet by which it emerges and the power it must remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that normally means that its makers succeeded at world-constructing, not invention. It could be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the pill pc, though his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now mostly forgotten. In hindsight, it’s simple to see why Ive’s pad succeeded where Gassée’s did not: twenty years of technological improvement provided better hardware, screens, batteries, software program, and connectivity. And though anybody considering a pill had most likely been prepared for one since even before the MessagePad thanks to the Star Trek universe being crammed with PADDs, the one factor that basically ready the world for the pill computer was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anyone had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion individuals used them. A world in which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to cell computing is one prepared for a bridge device between a small mobile display screen and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, of course, isn’t alone. So many products and applied sciences which are commonplace immediately made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t really succeed. Not because they weren’t good ideas, however as a result of the world wasn’t fairly ready and they weren’t powerful sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls nearly 15 years before Minority Report informed us all to expect them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 participant, of course; that distinction goes to the fully unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the first actually good or really profitable one; the iPod really ought to get the credit score for that. But, it did danger its identification on a monthly subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was offered to just weren’t ready for. Google Glass was launched in 2013 and died a humiliating but quick demise after a widely known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a actuality much creepier than any of us need.

But virtually a decade later, every major tech company is either making a face computer or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and then over and over. There are, of course, many older examples. Much older ones, in fact, just like the precise first car - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century before the primary fuel powered vehicle car launched by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the time period "battery" in 1749, but it wasn’t until half a century later that Alessandro Volta constructed one. And, it seems that the basics of batteries have been understood and in use over 2,000 years in the past! But my favourite one is the PicturePhone. The basic thought of transmitting image and audio over wire dates again to the 1870s (lengthy earlier than any of us have been warned by The Jetsons that video phones would drive us right into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many many years). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not but President) made the first public video call from Washington, D.C.