• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Pornhub has started accepting cryptocurrency as a fee choice, the company introduced right this moment. The positioning now accepts Verge cryptocurrency (no relation to The Verge), a rebranded model of Dogecoindark, which cut up off from the unique meme coin, Dogecoin, in 2014. Now, users will pay for any Pornhub options, xnxx together with a Premium subscription, utilizing Verge cryptocurrency. Pornhub’s grownup sister websites, Brazzers and Nutaku, additionally settle for Verge cryptocurrency now. Verge cryptocurrency is anonymity-focused, which is why Pornhub executives say they chose it over other potential companions. It needs to be noted that anyone can view Verge cryptocurrency transactions through its public ledger, but it makes use of the anonymity software Tor and an anonymous community layer I2P to cover specific transactions’ IP addresses and places. Since public ledgers often have their downfalls in protecting anonymity, users additionally choose to cover on Verge cryptocurrency’s non-public ledger. Corey Price, VP at Pornhub, tells The Verge that cryptocurrency offers "convenience and security." It’s a dubious assertion, considering most digital coins have excessive transaction fees and unstable costs that could be a hassle for users. Companies like Valve and Stripe have ended their cryptocurrency assist for those very causes. Stripe has even gone as far as including cryptocurrency to its prohibited companies listing. Verge cryptocurrency has been fairly unstable, like different well-liked digital coins. 0.22 per coin but has since dropped back down. On the heels of this announcement today, it rose to about 10 cents per coin, which is still low compared to more standard digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. "We’ve been looking at crypto for fairly some time," says Price, adding that Pornhub’s partner websites did accept limited cryptocurrencies back when Bitcoin had newly emerged as a digital forex. Still, Pornhub wasn’t one of the sites to include cryptocurrency as a payment methodology again then, likely as a result of Bitcoin’s costs have been nonetheless low.

Inventions that were forward of their time can help us to know whether we are really able to reside in the world we are making. Speculative fiction followers know that you can create a complete world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can start to describe a whole galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a complete alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for his or her every element - but hinting at them by highlighting mere sides that represent a coherent reality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the center. Creating objects in the actual world is nearly exactly the same; that’s why invention is a threat. When we create something new - really, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the stability of support it can have on this planet wherein it emerges and the facility it will have to remake that world.

When a product fails because it was "ahead of its time," that usually implies that its makers succeeded at world-constructing, not invention. It could possibly be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the pill computer, regardless that his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now mostly forgotten. In hindsight, it’s simple to see why Ive’s pad succeeded where Gassée’s did not: twenty years of technological improvement supplied better hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And though anyone taken with a pill had most likely been ready for one since even before the MessagePad because of the Star Trek universe being stuffed with PADDs, the one factor that really ready the world for the tablet computer was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion individuals used them. A world by which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to mobile computing is one ready for a bridge gadget between a small cell screen and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, in fact, isn’t alone. So many merchandise and applied sciences which are commonplace at present made their debuts in products that didn’t truly succeed. Not because they weren’t good concepts, but because the world wasn’t quite ready and they weren’t powerful enough to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls nearly 15 years earlier than Minority Report informed us all to count on them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 player, after all; that distinction goes to the fully unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It also wasn’t the primary actually good or actually successful one; the iPod really ought to get the credit score for that. But, it did danger its identification on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was bought to simply weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was launched in 2013 and died a humiliating but quick dying after a well known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a actuality a lot creepier than any of us need.