• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Mindy Seu (b. 1991, California) is a designer and technologist based in New York City. Her expanded observe entails archival initiatives, techno-crucial writing, performative lectures, design commissions, and close collaborations. Her newest writing surveys feminist economies, historic precursors of the metaverse, and the materiality of the web. Mindy’s ongoing Cyberfeminism Index, which gathers three a long time of on-line activism and web art, was commissioned by Rhizome, introduced at the new Museum, and awarded the Graham Foundation Grant. She has lectured internationally at cultural institutions (Barbican Centre, New Museum), academic institutions (Columbia University, Central Saint Martins), and mainstream platforms (Pornhub, SSENSE, Google), and been a resident at MacDowell, Sitterwerk Foundation, Pioneer Works, and Internet Archive. Her design commissions and session include projects for the Serpentine Gallery, Canadian Centre for Architecture, and MIT Media Lab. Her work has been featured in Frieze, Dazed, Gagosian Quarterly, Brooklyn Rail, i-D, and extra. Mindy holds an M.Des. Harvard’s Graduate School of Design and a B.A. Design Media Arts from the University of California, Los Angeles. She is at present Assistant Professor at Rutgers Mason Gross School of the Arts and Critic at Yale School of Art.

Now, take a second to look at among the demo. I ask you, is that not an impressive thing? Does it not look pretty great, even by today’s requirements? By all measures, it was a technical marvel and a good consumer experience. But it failed - bitterly. Bell Telephone’s plans for the PicturePhone had been ambitious, if not outright delusional. The cost of a PicturePhone plan was $160/month. Today, flagship mobile phones sell at round $a thousand a piece, but could you think about paying that value each month for service? That’s what $160 would have felt like in 1970. Bell set up PicturePhone booths in New York, Chicago, and Washington, D.C. 20/minute to use them. When was the final time you dropped $one hundred fifty in a vending machine? That’s the type of expense we’re speaking about. As batshit as the economics of the PicturePhone had been, Bell’s goal was to construct a $1 Billion company - 100,000 PicturePhones in the primary five years; 1,000,000 by 1980; 12,000,000 by 2000. Despite making a great piece of equipment and truly dazzling the technorati of the time by making it work effectively over outdated, twisted copper wire, that was by no means going to occur.

Today, it’s easy to ask why Bell wouldn’t have just subsidized the product in the early days to construct the market. The reply is regulation. On the time, Bell owned many of the infrastructure - the network over which the PicturePhone was transmitting. Taking a loss on the gadget to lock in clients would have triggered a massive antitrust case, and effectively, back then firms truly cared about that type of factor and so did the government. So, the PicturePhone was forced to be exorbitantly costly. Though an financial misfit, the PicturePhone was an excellent machine and a fair better catalyst. Researchers at Bell Labs knew that a digital future was at hand, and that new infrastructure would be required to help it. Several years before the PicturePhone was launched, Bell produced a film representing their view of the long run, referred to as Seeing the Digital Future, which anticipated a lot of today’s digital and web-driven culture.

Creating the PicturePhone allowed them to experiment with among the interactions they anticipated would grow to be commonplace, whereas also demonstrating the necessity for upgraded infrastructure. That Bell engineers were capable of deliver a device that transmitted strong sound and image over present telelphone traces was extraordinary. That they have been in a position to create such a compact, desk-prepared machine that was appropriate with the telephones already sitting on them was also. That the PicturePhone had a digicam that used actual glass optics and was refocusable and repositionable remotely makes me covet it, even now. Beyond those options, the PicturePhone released in 1970 anticipated much of today’s internet experience. Fluid and frequent digital connections between individuals, absolutely, but in addition the multimedia nature of how we trade info right now. Bell added video to what had been an entirely auditory connection experience so far, however additionally they constructed add-ons to attach PicturePhone to mainframe computers, share slides over the display, and even a mirror module that will permit the unit’s digicam to broadcast documents you had on your desk.

Undeniably cool, although admittedly area of interest for the time. Bell hoped that gaining a country’s value of subscribers would power a nationwide improve in digital infrastructure. As it would prove, even the internet, as we comprehend it immediately, wouldn’t try this. We'd have to distribute credit score for making the average American understand the necessity for fiber optic cable amongst a diverse constituency - from Google to Pornhub. Pricing and infrastructure could be blamed for what would grow to be a $500 million loss for porn Bell Telephone. Even that quantity doesn’t really describe how a lot of a misfire the PicturePhone was in contrast with the fact that in the primary 6 months, only 12 clients subscribed to the service, and by the point it was formally canceled, it had precisely zero of these customers left. But even in 1970, there were more than 12 people wealthy sufficient to be early adopters. So why didn’t they?