• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Last week, Utah Attorney General Sean D. Reyes joined 23 different states in a letter to Pornhub’s mother or father company with concerns over content material that includes underaged kids. As recently reported, an employee for the company was captured on video by an undercover journalist discussing Pornhub’s moderation practices, where he admitted a "loophole." When importing content to the location, users are required to submit a photograph ID but aren't required to show their face within the uploaded material. The worker admitted there isn't any option to confirm the person importing the photograph ID is the same individual in the content material. He replied, "Of course," when requested if rapists and human traffickers use this loophole to upload content of their victims to make cash. As you might be conscious, numerous Federal and state legal guidelines forbid the creation and distribution of CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material.) We're concerned that Aylo and its subsidiary Pornhub, and presumably different subsidiaries, could also be proliferating the manufacturing and dissemination of CSAM by the ‘loophole’ identified by your employee. Please provide us with an evidence of this ‘loophole;’ whether or not Aylo and its subsidiaries do, actually, permit content material creators and performers to obscure their faces in uploaded content material; and, if so, whether or not Aylo is taking measures to change this coverage to ensure that no children or other victims are being abused for profit on any of its platforms.

Inventions that had been ahead of their time will help us to understand whether or not we are actually able to dwell in the world we're making. Speculative fiction followers know which you can create an entire world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can start to describe a whole galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and tablet can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a complete alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their every detail - but hinting at them by highlighting mere facets that represent a coherent actuality beneath them. If that reality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its tales are endearing to the center. Creating objects in the actual world is sort of exactly the same; that’s why invention is a risk. Once we create one thing new - actually, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the stability of assist it will have on this planet by which it emerges and the ability it must remake that world.

When a product fails because it was "ahead of its time," that normally implies that its makers succeeded at world-constructing, not invention. It may very well be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet pc, despite the fact that his Newton MessagePad failed soon after it launch in 1993 and is now largely forgotten. In hindsight, it’s simple to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological development supplied better hardware, screens, batteries, software program, and connectivity. And even though anybody involved in a pill had in all probability been prepared for one since even before the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being stuffed with PADDs, the one thing that actually prepared the world for the pill computer was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion people used them. A world wherein over 70% of its population is already accustomed to cell computing is one ready for a bridge gadget between a small cell display screen and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, of course, xhamster isn’t alone. So many merchandise and technologies that are commonplace in the present day made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t really succeed. Not because they weren’t good ideas, but because the world wasn’t fairly ready they usually weren’t highly effective sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls virtually 15 years earlier than Minority Report informed us all to expect them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 player, in fact; that distinction goes to the fully unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the first really good or actually profitable one; the iPod really ought to get the credit score for that. But, it did threat its identity on a monthly subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was bought to just weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was launched in 2013 and died a humiliating however fast death after a well-known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a reality a lot creepier than any of us want.

But virtually a decade later, every major tech company is either making a face laptop or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and then again and again. There are, of course, many older examples. Much older ones, in truth, just like the precise first automobile - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century earlier than the first fuel powered car car launched by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the term "battery" in 1749, nevertheless it wasn’t until half a century later that Alessandro Volta constructed one. And, it turns out that the fundamentals of batteries had been understood and in use over 2,000 years ago! But my favourite one is the PicturePhone. The fundamental thought of transmitting image and audio over wire dates again to the 1870s (long before any of us were warned by The Jetsons that video phones would power us into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many many years). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not but President) made the first public video call from Washington, D.C.