• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Inventions that had been forward of their time will help us to know whether we are truly ready to live in the world we're making. Speculative fiction followers know that you could create a whole world out of only a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to describe an entire galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for an entire alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for his or her every detail - but hinting at them by highlighting mere sides that characterize a coherent reality beneath them. If that reality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the heart. Creating objects in the real world is sort of exactly the same; that’s why invention is a threat. When we create one thing new - really, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the balance of assist it could have in the world by which it emerges and the ability it should remake that world.

When a product fails because it was "ahead of its time," that usually means that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It could possibly be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet computer, despite the fact that his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now largely forgotten. In hindsight, it’s easy to see why Ive’s pad succeeded where Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological improvement offered higher hardware, screens, batteries, software program, and connectivity. And although anybody concerned about a tablet had most likely been ready for one since even before the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being stuffed with PADDs, the one factor that basically prepared the world for the pill pc was the cell phone. In 1993, hardly anyone had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion individuals used them. A world wherein over 70% of its population is already accustomed to cell computing is one ready for a bridge system between a small cellular display screen and a big stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, of course, isn’t alone. So many products and technologies that are commonplace at the moment made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t actually succeed. Not because they weren’t good concepts, however because the world wasn’t quite ready and they weren’t powerful sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls virtually 15 years earlier than Minority Report advised us all to anticipate them… ’re still not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 participant, of course; that distinction goes to the utterly unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It also wasn’t the first actually good or really successful one; the iPod really should get the credit for that. But, it did threat its id on a monthly subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was sold to just weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating but fast demise after a well known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a actuality much creepier than any of us want.

But nearly a decade later, every main tech company is either making a face computer or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, after which over and over again. There are, in fact, many older examples. Much older ones, in reality, just like the precise first car - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century before the primary gas powered automobile automobile introduced by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the time period "battery" in 1749, but it wasn’t till half a century later that Alessandro Volta built one. And, it seems that the fundamentals of batteries have been understood and in use over 2,000 years ago! But my favorite one is the PicturePhone. The basic thought of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates again to the 1870s (long before any of us had been warned by The Jetsons that video phones would pressure us into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many decades). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the primary public video call from Washington, D.C.

New York City. This early system used a closed circuit system, but inside a couple of many years, Bell Labs managed to create gear that could make use of the country’s current telephone traces. This is what Bell Telephone announced to the world at the 1964 World’s Fair, the PicturePhone. By that point, it was ready for hype, however not use. It took a few extra years of anticipation-constructing for Bell Telephone to get their product prepared. But they didn’t hold back on their advertising. In one of the most unbelievable examples of product placement in cinema of all time, porn Bell Telephone was prominently featured in a scene from Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: An area Odyssey in 1969. That was Bell’s means of saying, give us thirty years or so - not only will you be PicturePhoning cross-nation, you’ll be calling house, too! A yr later, the PicturePhone was demonstrated in public. The first call utilizing the first client-ready PicturePhone was made by the Mayor of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania to the chairman of Alcoa, one of the city’s most vital manufacturers.