• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Last week, Utah Attorney General Sean D. Reyes joined 23 other states in a letter to Pornhub’s father or mother firm with considerations over content material featuring underaged kids. As recently reported, an worker for the corporate was captured on video by an undercover journalist discussing Pornhub’s moderation practices, where he admitted a "loophole." When importing content material to the site, users are required to submit a photo ID but usually are not required to show their face within the uploaded materials. The employee admitted there isn't a option to verify the individual uploading the photograph ID is similar person in the content material. He replied, "Of course," when requested if rapists and human traffickers use this loophole to add content of their victims to make cash. As you are conscious, various Federal and state laws forbid the creation and distribution of CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material.) We are concerned that Aylo and its subsidiary Pornhub, and possibly other subsidiaries, could also be proliferating the manufacturing and dissemination of CSAM through the ‘loophole’ recognized by your worker. Please present us with a proof of this ‘loophole;’ whether Aylo and its subsidiaries do, in actual fact, permit content creators and performers to obscure their faces in uploaded content material; and, if so, whether Aylo is taking measures to change this policy to ensure that no youngsters or other victims are being abused for profit on any of its platforms.

Inventions that were forward of their time can assist us to grasp whether we are actually able to stay on this planet we're making. Speculative fiction fans know which you can create an entire world out of only a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to explain a whole galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a complete alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for his or her each detail - however hinting at them by highlighting mere sides that represent a coherent actuality beneath them. If that reality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its tales are endearing to the center. Creating objects in the real world is almost exactly the identical; that’s why invention is a threat. When we create something new - truly, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the stability of help it can have on the planet in which it emerges and the facility it must remake that world.

When a product fails because it was "ahead of its time," that normally implies that its makers succeeded at world-constructing, not invention. It could be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet laptop, despite the fact that his Newton MessagePad failed soon after it launch in 1993 and is now principally forgotten. In hindsight, it’s straightforward to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s did not: twenty years of technological improvement supplied better hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And regardless that anyone inquisitive about a pill had probably been ready for one since even before the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being stuffed with PADDs, the one factor that really prepared the world for the tablet computer was the cell phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion individuals used them. A world through which over 70% of its inhabitants is already accustomed to cellular computing is one prepared for a bridge system between a small cellular display and a big stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, of course, isn’t alone. So many merchandise and applied sciences which can be commonplace right this moment made their debuts in products that didn’t really succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good concepts, however because the world wasn’t quite ready and so they weren’t highly effective sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls almost 15 years earlier than Minority Report instructed us all to expect them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 player, after all; that distinction goes to the completely unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It also wasn’t the first actually good or actually successful one; the iPod really should get the credit score for that. But, it did threat its identity on a monthly subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was sold to just weren’t ready for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating but quick death after a widely known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a actuality a lot creepier than any of us want.

But virtually a decade later, every main tech firm is either making a face pc or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, after which again and again. There are, of course, many older examples. Much older ones, actually, just like the precise first vehicle - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century before the first gasoline powered car vehicle launched by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the time period "battery" in 1749, however it wasn’t till half a century later that Alessandro Volta built one. And, it turns out that the basics of batteries had been understood and in use over 2,000 years in the past! But my favorite one is the PicturePhone. The basic concept of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates again to the 1870s (long before any of us had been warned by The Jetsons that video phones would power us right into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many a long time). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not but President) made the primary public video call from Washington, D.C.