• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Hell back in '09 Pornhub was running clean on an identical stack with only a few servers (when you think about the visitors).If you happen to ask me most of what was "invented" after 2004 is stuff invented by Google/Facebook who're realistically the one ones needing it, but they saw an opportunity to scoop up market share in dev so they marketed their stack as "bleeding edge". The one factor bleeding is my eyes after i see one thing that might be wiped up in a typical PHP/Python/Ruby stack however as a substitute is made with so many dependencies and 3rd occasion library that you just wonder if the dude who wrote it really knows programming or if he just glued cool techs together as a result of Techcrunch and HackerNews say they're cool.But yes, the smaller gamers are normally using outdated stuff, then once more 99% of the online is. Hence why Wordpress continues to be a thing.And as a former Lead Dev of Pornhub, I can guarantee you that tech peeps positively are conscious of the bleeding edge of tech, simply that the majority tend to not buy the hype.

Inventions that have been ahead of their time may also help us to know whether or not we're truly ready to dwell on the earth we are making. Speculative fiction followers know that you would be able to create a whole world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to describe a whole galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for an entire alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for his or her every element - but hinting at them by highlighting mere facets that represent a coherent actuality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the center. Creating objects in the actual world is nearly precisely the same; that’s why invention is a risk. After we create one thing new - actually, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the steadiness of assist it will have on this planet during which it emerges and the power it must remake that world.

When a product fails because it was "ahead of its time," that often implies that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It might be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet computer, regardless that his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now principally forgotten. In hindsight, it’s simple to see why Ive’s pad succeeded where Gassée’s did not: twenty years of technological improvement offered higher hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And even though anyone concerned about a tablet had most likely been prepared for one since even before the MessagePad thanks to the Star Trek universe being full of PADDs, the one factor that actually ready the world for the tablet laptop was the cell phone. In 1993, hardly anyone had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion folks used them. A world by which over 70% of its inhabitants is already accustomed to cellular computing is one ready for a bridge gadget between a small cell screen and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, in fact, isn’t alone. So many products and applied sciences that are commonplace right this moment made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t actually succeed. Not because they weren’t good ideas, but because the world wasn’t quite ready and they weren’t highly effective sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls virtually 15 years before Minority Report advised us all to count on them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 participant, in fact; that distinction goes to the utterly unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It also wasn’t the first actually good or really profitable one; the iPod actually should get the credit for that. But, it did threat its identity on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was bought to just weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was launched in 2013 and died a humiliating but quick death after a well known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a reality much creepier than any of us want.

But nearly a decade later, every main tech company is either making a face pc or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and then over and over again. There are, in fact, many older examples. Much older ones, in fact, just like the actual first automobile - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century earlier than the first gasoline powered automobile automobile introduced by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the time period "battery" in 1749, but it surely wasn’t till half a century later that Alessandro Volta built one. And, it turns out that the fundamentals of batteries have been understood and in use over 2,000 years in the past! But my favourite one is the PicturePhone. The fundamental thought of transmitting image and audio over wire dates back to the 1870s (lengthy before any of us were warned by The Jetsons that video phones would drive us into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many a long time). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not but President) made the primary public video name from Washington, D.C.