• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Hell again in '09 Pornhub was running easy on an identical stack with only a few servers (when you think about the site visitors).In case you ask me most of what was "invented" after 2004 is stuff invented by Google/Facebook who're realistically the only ones needing it, but they saw an opportunity to scoop up market share in dev so they marketed their stack as "bleeding edge". The only factor bleeding is my eyes after i see one thing that could possibly be wiped up in a standard PHP/Python/Ruby stack however instead is made with so many dependencies and third occasion library that you just marvel if the dude who wrote it really knows programming or if he just glued cool techs together as a result of Techcrunch and HackerNews say they're cool.But yes, the smaller players are normally using outdated stuff, then once more 99% of the net is. Hence why Wordpress is still a factor.And as a former Lead Dev of Pornhub, I can guarantee you that tech peeps definitely are aware of the bleeding edge of tech, simply that almost all tend to not purchase the hype.

Inventions that have been ahead of their time may also help us to understand whether we're really able to live on the earth we are making. Speculative fiction fans know that you may create a complete world out of only a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to describe an entire galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a whole alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their every detail - however hinting at them by highlighting mere sides that symbolize a coherent actuality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the center. Creating objects in the real world is nearly exactly the identical; that’s why invention is a danger. When we create something new - truly, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the balance of help it may have on the planet through which it emerges and the facility it should remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that normally signifies that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It could possibly be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the pill computer, regardless that his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now principally forgotten. In hindsight, it’s simple to see why Ive’s pad succeeded where Gassée’s did not: twenty years of technological growth supplied better hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And although anybody focused on a pill had probably been prepared for one since even before the MessagePad because of the Star Trek universe being filled with PADDs, the one factor that really ready the world for the tablet computer was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anyone had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion individuals used them. A world during which over 70% of its inhabitants is already accustomed to cell computing is one ready for a bridge machine between a small cell display and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, after all, isn’t alone. So many merchandise and applied sciences which can be commonplace right now made their debuts in products that didn’t really succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good concepts, but because the world wasn’t quite prepared and so they weren’t highly effective sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls almost 15 years before Minority Report told us all to count on them… ’re still not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 player, after all; that distinction goes to the fully unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the first really good or really profitable one; the iPod actually ought to get the credit score for that. But, it did danger its identity on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was bought to just weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating but quick dying after a widely known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a reality a lot creepier than any of us want.

But virtually a decade later, each main tech company is both making a face computer or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and then again and again. There are, in fact, many older examples. Much older ones, in truth, like the actual first car - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century before the primary gasoline powered vehicle vehicle introduced by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the term "battery" in 1749, but it surely wasn’t until half a century later that Alessandro Volta constructed one. And, it turns out that the basics of batteries had been understood and in use over 2,000 years in the past! But my favourite one is the PicturePhone. The basic concept of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates back to the 1870s (lengthy earlier than any of us were warned by The Jetsons that video telephones would drive us into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many many years). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the first public video call from Washington, D.C.