• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Pornhub has began accepting cryptocurrency as a payment possibility, the corporate introduced at the moment. The positioning now accepts Verge cryptocurrency (no relation to The Verge), a rebranded model of Dogecoindark, which break up off from the unique meme coin, Dogecoin, in 2014. Now, users pays for any Pornhub features, together with a Premium subscription, utilizing Verge cryptocurrency. Pornhub’s grownup sister sites, Brazzers and Nutaku, also settle for Verge cryptocurrency now. Verge cryptocurrency is anonymity-targeted, which is why Pornhub executives say they selected it over other potential partners. It needs to be famous that anybody can view Verge cryptocurrency transactions by means of its public ledger, but it surely makes use of the anonymity tool Tor and an anonymous network layer I2P to hide specific transactions’ IP addresses and locations. Since public ledgers usually have their downfalls in defending anonymity, users additionally choose to hide on Verge cryptocurrency’s private ledger. Corey Price, VP at Pornhub, tells The Verge that cryptocurrency provides "convenience and security." It’s a dubious statement, contemplating most digital coins have excessive transaction charges and volatile prices that could be a problem for users. Companies like Valve and Stripe have ended their cryptocurrency help for those very reasons. Stripe has even gone so far as including cryptocurrency to its prohibited businesses list. Verge cryptocurrency has been fairly risky, like different well-liked digital coins. 0.22 per coin however has since dropped again down. On the heels of this announcement today, it rose to about 10 cents per coin, which remains to be low in comparison with more in style digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. "We’ve been looking at crypto for quite some time," says Price, adding that Pornhub’s companion websites did accept limited cryptocurrencies again when Bitcoin had newly emerged as a digital forex. Still, Pornhub wasn’t one of the sites to include cryptocurrency as a fee method again then, doubtless as a result of Bitcoin’s costs have been still low.

Inventions that have been ahead of their time may help us to grasp whether or not we are actually ready to dwell on the earth we are making. Speculative fiction followers know that you can create a complete world out of only a handful of objects. A lightsaber can start to describe an entire galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and tablet can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a complete alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their every element - but hinting at them by highlighting mere sides that symbolize a coherent actuality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the center. Creating objects in the true world is nearly exactly the identical; that’s why invention is a danger. When we create something new - actually, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the balance of help it may have on the planet wherein it emerges and the ability it will have to remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that often means that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It might be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet laptop, even though his Newton MessagePad failed soon after it launch in 1993 and is now mostly forgotten. In hindsight, it’s easy to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological improvement provided higher hardware, screens, xnxx batteries, software program, and connectivity. And regardless that anyone concerned about a tablet had in all probability been ready for one since even before the MessagePad because of the Star Trek universe being full of PADDs, the one thing that really prepared the world for the tablet computer was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion people used them. A world wherein over 70% of its inhabitants is already accustomed to mobile computing is one prepared for a bridge device between a small mobile screen and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, after all, isn’t alone. So many products and applied sciences that are commonplace right this moment made their debuts in products that didn’t truly succeed. Not because they weren’t good ideas, however because the world wasn’t fairly prepared they usually weren’t powerful enough to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls virtually 15 years earlier than Minority Report instructed us all to expect them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 participant, after all; that distinction goes to the fully unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It also wasn’t the first actually good or actually successful one; the iPod really ought to get the credit for that. But, it did threat its identity on a monthly subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was sold to only weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was launched in 2013 and died a humiliating however quick demise after a widely known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a reality much creepier than any of us need.