• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Hell back in '09 Pornhub was operating clean on a similar stack with only a few servers (when you consider the site visitors).Should you ask me most of what was "invented" after 2004 is stuff invented by Google/Facebook who're realistically the one ones needing it, but they noticed an opportunity to scoop up market share in dev so that they marketed their stack as "bleeding edge". The only thing bleeding is my eyes when i see something that could be wiped up in a regular PHP/Python/Ruby stack however as a substitute is made with so many dependencies and third party library that you simply surprise if the dude who wrote it really is aware of programming or if he just glued cool techs together because Techcrunch and HackerNews say they're cool.But yes, the smaller gamers are normally utilizing outdated stuff, then once more 99% of the web is. Hence why Wordpress remains to be a thing.And as a former Lead Dev of Pornhub, I can guarantee you that tech peeps undoubtedly are aware of the bleeding edge of tech, simply that most tend to not purchase the hype.

Inventions that were ahead of their time can help us to understand whether or not we're actually ready to stay in the world we are making. Speculative fiction followers know you could create a complete world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can start to describe a complete galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and tablet can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a whole alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their every element - however hinting at them by highlighting mere aspects that characterize a coherent actuality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the guts. Creating objects in the actual world is almost precisely the identical; that’s why invention is a danger. When we create something new - truly, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the steadiness of support it may have on the earth by which it emerges and the ability it should remake that world.

When a product fails because it was "ahead of its time," that normally means that its makers succeeded at world-constructing, not invention. It could be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the pill pc, despite the fact that his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now largely forgotten. In hindsight, it’s simple to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s did not: twenty years of technological improvement provided better hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And though anyone keen on a tablet had probably been ready for one since even before the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being full of PADDs, the one thing that really prepared the world for the tablet computer was the cell phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion folks used them. A world during which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to mobile computing is one ready for a bridge system between a small cell display and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, of course, isn’t alone. So many products and technologies which might be commonplace as we speak made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t truly succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good ideas, however as a result of the world wasn’t fairly prepared and so they weren’t highly effective sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls almost 15 years before Minority Report advised us all to expect them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 participant, after all; that distinction goes to the fully unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It also wasn’t the primary actually good or really profitable one; the iPod really ought to get the credit for that. But, it did threat its id on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was bought to simply weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating but quick dying after a widely known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a actuality a lot creepier than any of us need.

But virtually a decade later, every major tech firm is both making a face computer or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, after which over and over. There are, in fact, many older examples. Much older ones, in truth, just like the actual first vehicle - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century earlier than the primary gas powered car car launched by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the time period "battery" in 1749, however it wasn’t until half a century later that Alessandro Volta constructed one. And, it turns out that the basics of batteries had been understood and in use over 2,000 years in the past! But my favourite one is the PicturePhone. The essential concept of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates back to the 1870s (lengthy before any of us were warned by The Jetsons that video telephones would drive us into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many a long time). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not but President) made the primary public video call from Washington, D.C.